2009: A year beset with problems for India

December 30, 2009

a version of this was published by rediff and india abroad at http://news.rediff.com/column/2009/dec/29/a-year-beset-by-problems-for-india.htm

india abroad requested i write this, and gave me a deadline of dec 17th; therefore i was not able to cover things that happened later (eg. copenhagen and the delicious nd tiwari story).

The year in review: 2009
Rajeev Srinivasan considers how India fared in this past year
This was a crucial year for India. On the one hand its economy is doing fairly well, but, on the other hand, its continues to suffer from a non-existent long-term agenda. The latter may well result in India seizing defeat from the jaws of victory: despite the ‘demographic dividend’, the lack of a compelling ‘idea of India’ may well cause it to flounder aimlessly, if not disintegrate into a million pointless mutinies. Events in 2009 would have sown the seeds of either success or failure.
On the world stage, India suffered the ignominy of a re-hyphenation with Pakistan and a downgrading of its alleged ‘special relationship’ with the US. On climate change, India, apparently isolated and specifically targeted, may well end up in a constrained situation similar to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, wherein it is especially victimized.
While everyone talks about the G2 (the US and China) dominating world affairs, India is never  mentioned in the same breath. The arrival of the Obama administration in the US has led to a severe de-prioritization of India. The Bush administration was eager to sell the nuclear deal to India, and to engage it as a counterbalance to China. The Democrats – many of them cold warriors and non-proliferation ayatollahs – would rather kowtow to China while paying lip service to India.
The UPA government built a foreign policy around the wishful thinking of a permanent alignment of US and Indian interests. It is now virtually certain that the US views Asia as China’s sphere of influence – it said so in so many words while inviting China to take a role in ‘South Asia’ to mediate between India and Pakistan. And China has struck a muscular pose, interfering in Arunachal Pradesh, building 27 airstrips in Tibet, and damming the Brahmaputra. India has few bargaining chips, as it gave them away for nothing.
Internally, national elections produced what appeared to be a stronger mandate for the Congress party; however, by year-end, its blundering over a separate Telengana State made it look amateurish. Serious doubts were raised about its ability to deter China or Pakistan, because the thermonuclear explosion in Pokhran in 1998 now appears to have been a damp squib, and the armed forces are increasingly demoralized.
Public health and nutrition continue to be issues. A lasting image was that of green surgical-mask-clad city-dwellers attempting to elude the swine flu, and the inevitable hoarding and black-marketing of the appropriate small-aperture masks. India has been accused for some time of poor health practices, especially related to poor nutrition, poor access to clean water and sanitation, etc.
In 2009, raging inflation – official figures admit that the price of essential food staples have shot up by close to 20% – implies that more people are going hungry. At the World Summit on Food Security, the FAO reported that, in a shocking reversal of previous trends, 100 million people worldwide have joined the ranks of the hungry between 2001 and 2009. A large number of these must be Indians. Child hunger, in particular, persists, which is a national shame.
India’s apparently quick recovery from the global financial meltdown – it is now believed that GDP may grow by as much as 7-8% in 2009 – has been attributed to a thriving rural economy, and India’s isolation from world markets (a reflection of India’s poor export performance). The rural land-owner has become the target of advertising for anything from cars to washing machines to LCD TVs. However, there are still hundreds of farmers committing suicide because of crop failure, and as a result of the giant subsidies given to their farmers by developed nations, which allows their products to be priced below actual production cost.
Unfortunately, the way the UPA government has responded to the crisis in rural areas is to create a socialist make-work scheme, the NREGS, which is rife with opportunities for fraud. Despite some anecdotal evidence, the increasing burden of food-price inflation and the resultant hunger negate its impact. Besides, this scheme is now being viewed as an omnibus solution to all the problems of the rural poor, not the band-aid that it is.
The price tag for the NREGA, and for other populist schemes such as the massive giveaway to bureaucrats (which carefully avoided the military, leading to significant anger there) will be macroeconomic disaster down the road. The bills add up: Rs. 30,000 crore for the bureaucrats, Rs. 70,000 crore for the NREGA, and another Rs. 70,000 crore for a farm-loan forgiveness scheme. All this will add to inflationary pressures, and siphon off funds from investment.
Politics in India was, as usual, chaotic. The Congress party appeared to win national elections, although there were allegations of tampering with electronic voting machines, which are not exactly fool-proof. The opposition, led by the BJP, had been expected to do quite well because of anti-incumbency, but did not. In the aftermath of the elections, the BJP has appeared to implode, with calls for the resignation of its old guard.
The politics of balkanization came to the fore towards the year-end with the revival of a long-simmering demand for a separate State of Telengana, to be carved out of Andhra Pradesh. In a reflection of  centrifugal identity politics, there were copycat calls for other States to be created.
But the most worrisome short-term issue continues to be the appalling internal security situation. The interrogation of a suspect in the various blasts around the country, T Nazeer, suggests that Kerala has become the new hub of terrorism. The revelations in the ongoing saga of David Chapman Headley suggests that the ISI can strike at will anywhere in India with virtually no risk of detection. It appears another 11/26 – the Mumbai siege of last year – can happen any day, anywhere, in the country.
Thus, India is beset by problems – both internal and external – caused by lack of strategic thinking, and by being a soft State. One can only hope 2010 will be better.
1000 words, 17 Dec 2009

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: